johannes-vermeer-christ-in-the-house-of-martha-and-mary-1656-trivium-art-history

The Church’s liturgical cycle has recently invited us to reflect on Martha and Mary, Martha “concerned about many things,” and Mary having chosen “the better part” at Jesus’ feet, a part that will not be taken away from her (Luke 10:38-42). It is a well known theological tradition that Martha represents action, while Mary represents contemplation; Mary listens in adoring silence to the Teacher, while Martha serves on behalf of the Suffering Servant. Christ does not deride Martha in favor of Mary, but suggests that Mary’s intimacy has priority–we should do all things with Christ and for Christ. If we are all Martha and no Mary, our active service will become self-serving and misguided. Together, Martha and Mary represent the universal call to holiness, the mark of sainthood: heroic virtue and heroic prayer. The two can never occur in isolation; heroic virtue flows from heroic intimacy with Christ in contemplation. 

In an analogous way, Discourse 7 of Newman’s Idea of a University presents a similar dynamic when it comes to education. His insight is just as crucial to the formation of our children as Martha and Mary are to understanding sanctity. In previous discourses, he has established key principles that he now builds upon (that the highest aim of education is teaching knowledge, that theology is an essential and scientific part of education, and that learning knowledge is good in and of itself–see here for some review). 

Most proponents of educational reform today focus on the way in which students will be prepared for society, job, career, or college, or given practical skills with which to excel in these. The implication is that questions of education are mostly about impact on society, not about the particular flourishing of each child. Even those who defend classical education (or what Newman would call liberal education) might advance some variety of practical argument. And Newman does not think this is bad. But he has a very unique approach that is highly relevant and eminently practical.

In Discourse 7 Newman warns us against educationalists who make “Utility” their “watchword,” who “confine” education to some “particular and narrow end,” who try to identify which student will be a lawyer, which an engineer, which a surgeon, and determine those exclusive educational paths as early as possible. Newman turns this kind of pragmatism on its head, and argues that the best lawyer, the best engineer, the best surgeon, is the one who early on is allowed to let his mind range far and wide, who can roam in the pastures of knowledge freely. Newman thinks the best practitioners in any narrow field are those who have been trained in a wide, liberal education.  

Newman himself is a sterling example of this. Not only an accomplished writer, philosopher, theologian, teacher, and educational entrepreneur, he also applied himself to a wide amount of practical arts throughout his lifetime. In his early days as a student he was attracted to studying geology and mathematics. He was an excellent violin player, and was known to weep at the beauty of his playing. At the establishment of his English oratories, he had a direct hand in planning the layout and architecture. He filled in as an organist when his parish needed one, and wrote nearly an entire volume of poetry in the 1830s for the sake of evangelizing England to a more historic and apostolic understanding of the faith, published with poems by other authors under the title Lyra Apostolica. Newman’s interests and practices were as wide and liberal as the kind of education he defended. He can recommend it because he mastered it.

In Discourse 6, he has insisted that the cultivation of intellect is its own sufficient end. Knowledge is intrinsically good, good just because, in that knowledge is necessary for perfection of the mind, just as a flower perfects the plant, adding beauty and attracting bees. Knowledge might lead to other practical fruits and good effects, but those things are not what make it intrinsically good. Learning is self-justifying; it does not need any external standard aside from love of learning. Such freedom to learn inclines one to “apprehend and contemplate truth,” to gain capacities to think and attain “intellectual perfection.” 

But here, in Discourse 7, he is interested in granting a certain pragmatic point, a certain “Utility” that he has previously rejected as proper to the cause or essence or end of knowledge, but which is its legitimate effect. He asserts, it is a “matter of rule,” a principle, that “disciplined for its own sake,” not “being formed or sacrificed to some particular or accidental purpose,” a mind truly formed in “Liberal Education” is ultimately of value in social and civic spheres. But it does not become so by making such practical value the end goal. Making knowledge for its own sake the main goal, one’s reason is enlarged or expanded, one learns to think, and a high “standard of excellence” is set for all activities. Christ says “whoever would save his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it” (Matthew 16:25). By analogy, Newman’s argument is, in sum, that whoever seeks utility for its own sake will lose it, but whoever loses utility for the sake of liberal education will find both. If one wishes to be of practical use in the world, he must surrender his mind to the truth wherever it leads, even to the possible exclusion of an initially practical plan. Lacking such openness, not only will the truth not be known, but any potential utility itself will be diminished, since one will tend to bend and misconstrue truth to fit a predetermined framework, doing the thing one had imagined doing without any reference to what is true about it.

Rather than confining the purpose of education to some “particular and narrow end” that can be “weighed and measured,” Newman sets higher ambitions and a more dignified aim. Attaching a “mere price” to what is useful in education is an unhealthy, cramped, nearly immoral basis on the philosophy of “Utility” that is entirely inappropriate for education and unfair to the students whose minds are in need of formation. Think back to Mary and Martha–Mary’s is the better part, the part that cannot be taken away, while Martha’s service requires an orientation toward Mary’s priorities to best flourish. By analogy, a liberal education is the “better part” that can never be taken away–a love of learning for its own sake. This love of learning is what all practical utility or social usefulness flows from. But to devote to practical utility without love of learning will disorder the utility anyway–it will confine it to an anxious and tunnel-visioned action that becomes lost in its own self-absorption. The truly active mind is the contemplative mind, the mind that seeks knowledge and truth both within and beyond the shifting sands of practical demands and limited calculations of usefulness. Newman values both, but indicates to us how practicality thrives only with a higher habit of love for knowledge for its own sake. 

I will explore Newman’s case for liberal education in more depth in subsequent posts, as well as his startling analogies that help us understand the profound truth of what he argues, and the reasons why we desperately need this message now. Increasingly in our time, children in schools are becoming the “guinea pigs” of society, their bodies, minds and souls literally experimented with to re-shape society in our own image. Granting that each child is made in the image and likeness of God, and that they are ultimately made for the reality that God has made, Newman has something much more stable, holistic, and healthy in mind for our children’s formation, something that every parent, educator, and leader should harken to. 

Like this article?

What is the doctrine of the Trinity? The Athanasian Creed, in common use around the sixth century, formulates it this way: "We worship one God in the Trinity and the Trinity in unity, without either confusing the persons or dividing the substance; for the person of the Father is one, the Son's is another, the Holy Spirit's another; but the Godhead of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is one, their glory equal, their majesty coeternal."

The true light of Christ’s divinity was made visible to the Apostles at the Transfiguration.

Leave a comment

What is the doctrine of the Trinity? The Athanasian Creed, in common use around the sixth century, formulates it this way: "We worship one God in the Trinity and the Trinity in unity, without either confusing the persons or dividing the substance; for the person of the Father is one, the Son's is another, the Holy Spirit's another; but the Godhead of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is one, their glory equal, their majesty coeternal."

Our Books

About Cardinal John Henry Newman

Purchase Book


A Guide to John Henry Newman will interest educated readers and professors alike, and serve as a text for college seminars for the purpose of studying Newman.

Review by Catherine Maybanks
(Catholic Herald, April 1, 2023)

Review by Serenheed James
(Antiphon, April 2023)

Purchase Book

 
Fr Peter Conley takes us on an exciting journey into the spirituality and inner life of Saint John Henry Newman.
 

Purchase Book


Endorsement by Neyra Blanco (Amazon)
I bought this book for my son and he loved it, he wrote this review and urged my to submitted: “I think this book has a very beautiful message, because it shows how the young Newman was so determined to achieve his dream of becoming a priest, but even after his dream he continued to work in the church with passion until the day he died, it’s so admirable that even Newman so old and so weak still had that urge to continued his work of being a priest. And the book is well written with words not too complicated with very enjoyable texts and well illustrated pictures. I highly recommend this book for a 5th grader.  

Purchase Book


What is a Classical Liberal Arts Education? Why is it so important for the development of a person?

Fr. Juan R. Vélez answers these and more questions you might have about University Education in the 21st century. This book is aimed for parents, prospective University students, and educators. It will help you discern why adding Liberal Arts electives to your education will help it form it better, and help the student learn to reason, and not just learn.

He also explains how many Universities have changed the true meaning of Liberal Arts, and the subjects, and gives advise on how to choose College Campus, Subjects, and Teachers.

A wonderful book that every parent should also read way before your children are College bound. A Liberal Arts education can start earlier in life, even from home.

Purchase Book


Endorsement by Christopher Moellering (Goodreads, September 14, 2019)
In Passion for Truth Fr. Vélez gave us an outstanding biography of Cardinal Newman. In this work, he provides a concise overview of his thought and his devotion. This is a great work for someone who, perhaps hearing of Newman for the first time because of his beatification 13 October, 2019, wants to know more about this English saint.Vélez is a wonderful writer in his own right, and the frequent quotations from Newman round out the work nicely. I especially appreciated the frequent citing of Newman’s Meditations and Devotions, which show a different side of his spirituality than his more well-known works, Development of Christian Doctrine and the Grammar of Assent.

Purchase Book


Take Five: Meditations with John Henry Newman, endorsement by Illow M. Roque (Amazon, September 3, 2010)
“There is a time to put direct inquiry on hold and give ourselves to prayer and practical duties.” Sound advice from one of the earlier, thought-provoking reminders in this sparkling gem of a book: Take Five | Meditations with John Henry Newman, written by Mike Aquilina and Fr. Juan R. Vélez and published by Our Sunday Visitor. This particular paragraph, referenced above, which begins with a direct quote from soon-to-be canonized priest, cardinal and poet, John Henry Newman: “Study is good, but it gets us only so far . . .” is actually the 15th in a series of 76 concise, logically organized meditations moving from the elementary to the sublime. Each meditation–one per page–is built upon the great man’s writings and remarkably rich spirituality. Whether taken whole in one reading or in part page-by-page over a course of weeks and months, these wonderfully insightful meditations will open up, even to the busiest reader in the midst of the world, a unique pathway into prayer and contemplation. My advice to spiritual inquirers at all levels, from the novice to the spiritually adept, is to follow the authors’ recommendation to use this book as a guide for daily prayer and meditation. The structure of the book itself is ideal: first, the authors introduce us to Cardinal Newman, the man, where we are given the opportunity to get to know him through a brief sketch of his life and spirituality at the beginning of the book. This is something readers will likely find themselves referring to again and again, prompting many, I suspect, to even wider explorations of this most gifted Christian leader. Then comes the meditations, consisting of a short summary of Newman’s thoughts on subjects taken, as the authors explain, from various salient points for which Newman is justly remembered: The pursuit of objective religious truth; Teaching on the Virtues; Defense of the Catholic Church; A devout spiritual and moral life; and Generosity and loyalty in his friendships, which sets the topic and tone for each meditation to follow. Each meditation consists of an excerpt taken from Newman’s thirty-plus volumes of writings and diaries. Next comes three brief and extremely useful sections entitled: “Think About It,” which establishes a prayerfully resonant tone throughout the book; “Just Imagine,” which provides a vivid, prayerful experience of the Scriptures that tie in, and finally, “Remember,” a pithy summation which the authors suggest may be used as a daily aspiration. Each meditation is given its own page, which makes it ideal for daily reflection for readers on the go. This book is a must have for every serious Catholic who wants to take their faith to the next level, which is to respond appropriately to the universal call to holiness and seek interior union with God.
Sermon Blog
David Warren

The Mystery of the Holy Trinity

What is the doctrine of the Trinity? The Athanasian Creed, in common use around the sixth century, formulates it this way: “We worship one God in the Trinity and the Trinity in unity, without either confusing the persons or dividing the substance; for the person of the Father is one, the Son’s is another, the Holy Spirit’s another; but the Godhead of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is one, their glory equal, their majesty coeternal.”

Read More »
About Newman
Fr. Juan Velez

The Eucharistic Presence

We call His presence in this Holy Sacrament a spiritual presence, not as if ‘spiritual’ were but a name or mode of speech.

Read More »
About Newman
Prof. Barb H. Wyman

The Priestly Office

The sacrifice of the altar as a re-presentation of the sacrifice of Calvary is a “bloodless rite,” but nevertheless, like that sacrifice, it too is a “fire of Love,” and a “Fount of Light.”

Read More »
About Newman
Fr. Juan Velez

The Indwelling Spirit

With this indwelling of the Holy Spirit, we have the indwelling of Christ in our souls. Christ is born in us. The Holy Spirit makes us children of God, crying out Abba Father, and restores in us the likeness of Christ.

Read More »